GERALD RODRIGUEZ, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
GERALD RODRIGUEZ, APPELLANT,
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
232 So. 3d 483
Florida District Court of Appeal, Second District (2017)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
Mr. Rodriguez appeals from the judgment and sentence entered following the revocation of probation for the 2012 count of manufacturing marijuana, for which the trial court originally accepted his plea and withheld adjudication while he served the probationary sentence. We affirm the revocation and the judgment and sentence that were entered without further comment, but because the order of revocation does not specify the conditions Rodriguez admitted violating, we remand for the entry of an order specifying those conditions. See Huggins v. State, 216 So.3d 785 (Fla. 2d DCA 2017).
Affirmed; remanded with directions.
NORTHCUTT, BLACK, and SALARIO, JJ., Concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Clifton v. State, 241 So. 3d 274 (Fla. 2d DCA 2018)…evocation does not specify the conditions Mr. Clifton admitted violating—specifically conditions (3) - 2 - and (10) as set forth in the affidavit of violation—we remand for the entry of an order specifying those conditions. See Rodriguez v. State, 232 So. 3d 483 (Fla. 2d DCA 2017); Huggins v. State, 216 So. 3d 785 (Fla. 2d DCA 2017). Affirmed; remanded with directions. KHOUZAM, LUCAS, and SALARIO, JJ., Concur.…
Authorities Cited
- Huggins v. State, 216 So. 3d 785 (Fla. 2d DCA 2017)
- State v. Murillo, 216 So. 3d 785 (Fla. 1st DCA 2017)