JOHN GODFREY, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
JOHN GODFREY, APPELLANT,
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
220 So. 3d 1273
Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (2017)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
The order authorizing involuntary medical treatment is affirmed as the requirements of section 916.107(3)(a), Florida Statutes (2016), were proved by competent, substantial evidence. We note that order is not moot despite the fact that the 90-day period of treatment mandated by the order has expired. See Godwin v. State, 593 So.2d 211 (Fla. 1992), and Hills v. State, 699 So.2d 735 (Fla. 1st DCA 1997).
AFFIRMED.
ROBERTS, C.J., LEWIS and BILBREY, JJ., CONCUR.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Marlyn Tracey v. Wells Fargo Bank, 264 So. 3d 1152 (Fla. 2d DCA 2019)…A 2014) (holding that because plaintiff failed to submit any evidence supporting the amount of indebtedness "reversal for entry of an order of dismissal is warranted"); Paeth v. U.S. Bank Nat'l Ass'n for C-Bass Mortg. Loan Asset-Backed Certificates, 220 So. 3d 1273, 1275 (Fla. 2d DCA 2017) (holding that because "the Bank offered some evidence, albeit insufficient, to prove the amount of indebtedness ... the Bank is entitled to further proceedings on remand to determine the amount of the indebtedness"). Rather,…
-
Deutsche Bank Tr. Co. Americas v. JB Inv. Realty, 274 So. 3d 1114 (Fla. 4th DCA 2019)
Authorities Cited
- Sallas v. State, 593 So. 2d 211 (Fla. 1992)
- Godwin v. State, 593 So. 2d 211 (Fla. 1992)
- Earnest Hills v. State, 699 So. 2d 735 (Fla. 1st DCA 1997)