ANNA MARTIN, ADMINISTRATRIX, ETC., PLAINTIFF IN ERROR,
v.
CHICAGO, MILWAUKEE & ST. PAUL RAILWAY COMPANY
ANNA MARTIN, ADMINISTRATRIX, ETC., PLAINTIFF IN ERROR,
CHICAGO, MILWAUKEE & ST. PAUL RAILWAY COMPANY
246 U.S. 649
Supreme Court of the United States (1918)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Per_curiam
Per Curiam.
Judgment affirmed with costs upon the authority of Chicago Junction Ry. Co. v. King, 222 U. S. 222; Seaboard Air Line Ry. v. Padgett, 236 U. S. 668, 673; Seaboard Air Line Ry. v. Koennecke, 239 U. S. 352, 355; Great Northern Ry. Co. v. Knapp, 240 U. S. 464, 466; Baltimore & Ohio R. R. Co. v. Whitacre, 242 U. S. 169.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
In re the Petition for Naturalization of Brenda Barbara Weitzman, 426 F.2d 439 (8th Cir. 1970)…dman v. United States, 245 U.S. 474, 38 S.Ct. 166, 62 L.Ed. 410 (1918) ; Kramer v. United States, 245 U.S. 478, 38 S.Ct. 168, 62 L.Ed. 413 (1918); Ruthenberg v. United States, 245 U.S. 480, 38 S.Ct. 168, 62 L.Ed. 414 (1918); Yanyar v. United States, 246 U.S. 649, 38 S.Ct. 332, 62 L.Ed. 920 (1918); and Stephens v. United States, 247 U.S. 504, 38 S.Ct. 579, 62 L.Ed. 1239 (1918). The issue in these World War I cases seems to me to have arisen in a more difficult context because the statute there under consider…
-
Stephens v. United States, 247 U.S. 504 (U.S. 1918)…Per Curiam. Judgment affirmed upon the authority of Selective Draft Law Cases, 245 U. S. 366; Yanyar v. United States, 246 U. S. 649.…
Authorities Cited
- Seaboard Air Line Railway v. Padgett, 236 U.S. 668 (U.S. 1915)
- Chicago Junction Ry. Co. v. King, 222 U.S. 222 (U.S. 1911)
- Great N. Ry. Co. v. Knapp, 240 U.S. 464 (U.S. 1916)
- Seaboard Air Line Railway v. Koennecke, 239 U.S. 352 (U.S. 1915)
- Baltimore & Ohio R.R. Co. v. Whitacre, 242 U.S. 169 (U.S. 1916)