ANNA MARTIN, ADMINISTRATRIX, ETC., PLAINTIFF IN ERROR,
v.
CHICAGO, MILWAUKEE & ST. PAUL RAILWAY COMPANY

U.S. | 1918-03-18
No. 196
246 U.S. 649 Supreme Court of the United States (1918) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases

Per_curiam
Per Curiam.

Per Curiam.

Judgment affirmed with costs upon the authority of Chicago Junction Ry. Co. v. King, 222 U. S. 222; Seaboard Air Line Ry. v. Padgett, 236 U. S. 668, 673; Seaboard Air Line Ry. v. Koennecke, 239 U. S. 352, 355; Great Northern Ry. Co. v. Knapp, 240 U. S. 464, 466; Baltimore & Ohio R. R. Co. v. Whitacre, 242 U. S. 169.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • …dman v. United States, 245 U.S. 474, 38 S.Ct. 166, 62 L.Ed. 410 (1918) ; Kramer v. United States, 245 U.S. 478, 38 S.Ct. 168, 62 L.Ed. 413 (1918); Ruthenberg v. United States, 245 U.S. 480, 38 S.Ct. 168, 62 L.Ed. 414 (1918); Yanyar v. United States, 246 U.S. 649, 38 S.Ct. 332, 62 L.Ed. 920 (1918); and Stephens v. United States, 247 U.S. 504, 38 S.Ct. 579, 62 L.Ed. 1239 (1918). The issue in these World War I cases seems to me to have arisen in a more difficult context because the statute there under consider…
  • Stephens v. United States, 247 U.S. 504 (U.S. 1918)
    …Per Curiam. Judgment affirmed upon the authority of Selective Draft Law Cases, 245 U. S. 366; Yanyar v. United States, 246 U. S. 649.…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw