OTTO MUELLER ET AL.
v.
NORTHERN PACIFIC RAILWAY COMPANY
OTTO MUELLER ET AL.
NORTHERN PACIFIC RAILWAY COMPANY
255 U.S. 562
Supreme Court of the United States (1921)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 4 cases
Per_curiam
Per Curiam.
Dismissed for want of jurisdiction upon the authority of § 237 of the Judicial Code, as amended by the Act of September 6, 1916, c. 448, § 2, 39 Stat. 726.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
City of Winfield v. Court of Indus. Relations, 263 U.S. 680 (U.S. 1923)…Pittsburgh Street Ry. Co., 258 U. S. 604; Avon v. Detroit United Railway, 257 U. S. 618; Chicago v. Chicago Railways Co., 257 U. S. 617; Groesbeck v. Detroit United Railway, 257 U. S. 609; Hillsboro v. Public Service Commission of Oregon, point (3), 255 U. S. 562; Kansas City v. Public Service Commission of Missouri, 250 U. S. 652; Pawhuska v. Pawhuska Oil Co., 250 U. S. 394; Hunter v. Pittsburgh, 207 U. S. 161, 178.…
-
City of Sapulpa v. Okla. Natural Gas Co., 258 U.S. 608 (U.S. 1922)…Dismissed upon the authority of Hunter v. Pittsburgh, 207 U. S. 161, 178; Pawhuska v. Pawhuska Oil Co., 250 U. S. 394; Kansas City v. Public Service Commission of Missouri, 250 U. S. 652; Hillsboro v. Public Service Commission of Oregon, point (3), 255 U. S. 562; Groesbeck v. Detroit United Railway, 257 U. S. 609; Chicago v. Chicago Railways Co., 257 U. S. 617; Avon v. Detroit United Railway, 257 U. S. 618; Edgewood v. Wilkinsburg & East Pittsburgh Street Ry. Co., ante, 604.…
-
Twp. of Avon v. Detroit United Railway, 257 U.S. 618 (U.S. 1921)…upon the authority of Pawhuska v. Pawhuska Oil & Gas Co., 250 U. S. 394, 397; Hunter v. Pittsburgh, 207 U. S. 161, 178; Kansas City v. Public Service Commission of Missouri, 250 U. S. 652; Hillsboro v. Public Service Commission of Oregon, point (3), 255 U. S. 562; Groesbeck v. Detroit United Railway, ante, 609.…
Previewing 3 of 4 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence