CITY OF SAPULPA ET AL.
v.
OKLAHOMA NATURAL GAS COMPANY
CITY OF SAPULPA ET AL.
OKLAHOMA NATURAL GAS COMPANY
258 U.S. 608
Supreme Court of the United States (1922)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Per_curiam
Per Curiam.
Dismissed upon the authority of Hunter v. Pittsburgh, 207 U. S. 161, 178; Pawhuska v. Pawhuska Oil Co., 250 U. S. 394; Kansas City v. Public Service Commission of Missouri, 250 U. S. 652; Hillsboro v. Public Service Commission of Oregon, point (3), 255 U. S. 562; Groesbeck v. Detroit United Railway, 257 U. S. 609; Chicago v. Chicago Railways Co., 257 U. S. 617; Avon v. Detroit United Railway, 257 U. S. 618; Edgewood v. Wilkinsburg & East Pittsburgh Street Ry. Co., ante, 604.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
City of Winfield v. Court of Indus. Relations, 263 U.S. 680 (U.S. 1923)…Per Curiam. Dismissed for want of jurisdiction, upon the authority of Trenton v. New Jersey, 262 U. S. 182; Newark v. New Jersey, 262 U. S. 192; Sapulpa v. Oklahoma Natural Gas Co., 258 U. S. 608; Edgewood v. Wilkinsburg & East Pittsburgh Street Ry. Co., 258 U. S. 604; Avon v. Detroit United Railway, 257 U. S. 618; Chicago v. Chicago Railways Co., 257 U. S. 617; Groesbeck v. Detroit United Railway, 257 U. S. 609; Hillsboro v. Public Service…
-
City of Tulsa v. Okla. Natural Gas Co. (E.D. Okla. 1925)…v. Pawhuska Oil & Gas Co., 250 U. S. 394, 39 S. Ct. 526, 63 L. Ed. 1054; Laramie County v. Albany County, 92 U. S. 307, 25 L. Ed. 552; Hunter v. City of Pittsburg, 207 U. S. 161, 28 S. Ct. 40, 52 L. Ed. 151; City of Sapulpa v. Okl. Natural Gas Co., 258 U. S. 608, 42 S. Ct. 316, 66 L. Ed. 788. Mr. Justice Butler, in delivering the opinion in City of Trenton v. State of New Jersey, supra, in discussing the distinction between the governmental and proprietary power of municipalities, said: “The basis of the d…
Authorities Cited
- Hunter v. City of Pittsburgh, 207 U.S. 161 (U.S. 1907)
- City of Pawhuska v. Pawhuska OIL & GAS Co., 250 U.S. 394 (U.S. 1919)
- People of the State of Mich. ex rel. Alex. J. Groesbeck v. Detroit United Railway, 257 U.S. 609 (U.S. 1921)
- Otto Mueller v. N. Pac. Ry. Co., 255 U.S. 562 (U.S. 1921)
- City of Hillsboro v. Pub. Serv. Comm'n of Or., 255 U.S. 562 (U.S. 1921)
- State of Okla. v. State of Tex., 257 U.S. 609 (U.S. 1921)
- City of Chicago v. Chicago Railways Co., 257 U.S. 617 (U.S. 1921)
- Leopold Sternberger v. Continental Mines, 257 U.S. 617 (U.S. 1921)
- Eastman Jones v. Seiffert, 257 U.S. 618 (U.S. 1921)
- Krauss Bros. Lumber Co. v. Bd. of Assessors for the Parish of Orleans, 257 U.S. 618 (U.S. 1921)