BOROUGH OF EDGEWOOD
v.
WILKINSBURG & EAST PITTSBURGH STREET RAILWAY COMPANY ET AL; AND BOROUGH OF EDGEWOOD V. PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA ET AL.

U.S. | 1922-03-13
Nos. 152; No. 266
258 U.S. 604 Supreme Court of the United States (1922)

Opinion of the Court
Per Curiam,.

Per Curiam,.

Dismissed for want of jurisdiction upon the authority of Hunter v. Pittsburgh, 207 U. S. 161, 178; Pawhuska v. Pawhuska Oil Co., 250 U. S. 394, 397; Kansas City v. Public Service Commission of Missouri, 250 U. S. 652; Hillsboro v. Public Service Commission of Oregon; point (3), 255 U. S. 562; Groesbeck v. Detroit United Railway, 257 U. S. 609; Chicago v. Chicago Railways Co., 257 U. S. 617; Avon v. Detroit United Railway, 257 U. S. 618.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw