WALTER C. OAKFORD, PLAINTIFF,
v.
LOUISE M. OAKFORD, DEFENDANT
WALTER C. OAKFORD, PLAINTIFF,
LOUISE M. OAKFORD, DEFENDANT
176 So. 2d 563
Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1963)
Caution
Cited by 8 cases
Opinion of the Court
We are called upon to answer a question certified to us by the chancellor of the Circuit Court of Dade County pursuant to Florida Appellate Rule 4.6, 31 F.S.A.
It appearing that the chancellor has already made judicial determination of the question, there is no basis for our entertaining the certified question. The attempted certification amounts to an interlocutory appeal. The certificate is denied. See Hunter v. Flowers, Fla.1949, 38 So.2d 438; Johnson v. Southeast Title and Insurance, Fla.App.1963, 148 So.2d 67; Prigger v. Kingery, Fla.App.1962, 144 So.2d 323.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
State v. Honorable Harvie S. Duval, 287 So. 2d 370 (Fla. 3d DCA 1973)…Turning to the case sub judice, ■the trial judge having decided to certify the issues raised in relator’s motion to dismiss, could not rule on the motion until the Florida Supreme Court rendered its findings. See Oakford v. Oakford, Fla.App. 1963, 176 So. 2d 563. Thus, the trial’ judge was warranted in properly not setting the case for trial until he could dispose of relator’s motion to dismiss which raised constitutional questions. In addition, the record demonstrates that counsel for relator made it clear…
-
Hatcher v. S. Life & Health Ins. Co., 207 So. 2d 316 (Fla. 2d DCA 1968)…as caused by asphyxiation less than one hour after and as a direct result of vomitus being accidentally inhaled by decedent. The court below dismissed the complaint on authority of Strowmatt v. Volunteer State Life Insurance Company, Fla.App. 1965, 176 So. 2d 563. The appeal involved the following question: Did decedent die by bodily injury effected solely through external, violent and accidental means? In the Strowmatt case, supra, the Circuit Court of Sarasota County granted a summary judgment for the ins…
-
State v. Neckman, 320 So. 2d 21 (Fla. 3d DCA 1975)…y the trial judges. * * *” ** Therefore, on the authority of State v. Potter, supra; Prigger v. Kingery, Fla.App.1962, 144 So. 2d 323; Johnson v. Southeast Title and Insurance Company, Fla.App.1963, 148 So. 2d 67; Oakford v. Oakford, Fla.App.1963, 176 So. 2d 563; Boyer v. City of Orlando, Fla.1970, 232 So. 2d 169, we are compelled to deny the certificate.…
Previewing 3 of 4 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Prigger v. Kingery, 144 So. 2d 323 (Fla. 3d DCA 1962)
- Johnson v. Se. Title & Ins. Co., 148 So. 2d 67 (Fla. 3d DCA 1963)
- Hunter v. Flowers, 38 So.2d 438 (Fla. 1949)