WARREN BROWN, APPELLANT,
v.
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The court held that the trial judge did not err in denying the motion to vacate judgment and sentence.
Appellant pleaded guilty to first-degree murder after the state presented its case. He later filed a motion to vacate the judgment, alleging various c…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Denial Of Counsel cases and more on FLexlaw
This is an appeal by Warren Brown from a summary denial of his motion to vacate judgment and sentence under Criminal Procedure Rule 1,'F.S.A. ch. 924 Appendix.
Appellant went to trial, on a charge of murder in the first degree. After the state had put on its witnesses and introduced its evidence, the defendant, upon advice of his privately employed counsel; changed his plea from not guilty to guilty. lie was thereafter adjudged guilty of murder in the first degree and sentenced to life imprisonment.
Appellant’s motion for relief sets forth that he was not advised of his constitutional rights; that he was denied counsel during critical pretrial stages of interrogation; that he was caused through threats of physical harm to give a confession which was allowed in evidence; that the' state knowingly used perjured testimony against him and that he was coerced into changing his plea from not guilty to guilty.
We. have carefully considered all of appellant’s contentions in the light of the record and the applicable law and find no error in the action of the trial judge in entering the order here under review. See Brown v. State, Fla.App.1964, 163 So.2d 335; Taylor v. State, Fla.App.1964, 169 So.2d 861; Thomas v. State, Fla.App.1965, 172 So.2d 245; Williams v. State, Fla.App. 1965, 174 So.2d 775; Manning v. State, Fla.App.1965, 176 So.2d 380; Thompson v. State, Fla.App.1965, 176 So.2d 564.
Affirmed.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Weeks v. State, 201 So. 2d 764 (Fla. 3d DCA 1967)…d does not furnish a basis for relief under the present motion. See Taylor v. State, Fla.App. 1964, 169 So. 2d 861; Thompson v. State, Fla.App. 1965, 176 So. 2d 564, 567; Clayton v. State, Fla. App.1966, 188 So. 2d 395; Brown v. State, Fla.App.1966, 190 So. 2d 405. The order appealed from is affirmed.…
Authorities Cited
- Bridges v. State, 169 So. 2d 861 (Fla. 3d DCA 1964)
- Thompson v. State, 176 So. 2d 564 (Fla. 3d DCA 1965)
- Thomas v. State, 172 So. 2d 245 (Fla. 2d DCA 1965)
- Gerald "Pops" Brown v. State, 163 So. 2d 335 (Fla. 3d DCA 1964)
- Manning v. State, 176 So. 2d 380 (Fla. 3d DCA 1965)
- Williams v. State, 174 So. 2d 775 (Fla. 3d DCA 1965)