PHILLIP CHAFETZ, APPELLANT,
v.
HAROLD GREENE ET AL., APPELLEES

Fla. 3d DCA | 1967-10-17
No. 67-171
Before PEARSON, HENDRY and SWANN, JJ.
203 So. 2d 18 Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1967) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

This appeal is from a decree dismissing a complaint which sought to enjoin a special election called to determine whether the Dade County Home Rule Charter should be amended. The election has been held and inasmuch as no other relief than the injunction was sought, the matter is now moot and the appeal is dismissed. Cf. Tyler v. Peacock, 98 Fla. 981, 124 So. 463 (1929); Gill v. City of North Miami Beach, Fla.App.1963, 156 So.2d 182.

Affirmed.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • Halloran v. Pensacola Ass'n OF Life Underwriters, Inc., 395 So. 2d 554 (Fla. 1st DCA 1981)
    …to be enjoined has already expired, the issues presented by this appeal have become moot. Coursen v. City of South Daytona, 127 So. 2d 905 (Fla. 1st DCA 1961); Gill v. City of North Miami Beach, 156 So. 2d 182 (Fla. 3d DCA 1963); Chafetz v. Greene, 203 So. 2d 18 (Fla. 3d DCA 1967). Accordingly, this appeal is dismissed on our own motion without prejudice to the right of appellant to pursue such other action for relief as he may be advised. Appeal dismissed. ERVIN, LARRY G. SMITH, and SHIVERS, JJ., concu…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw