MICHAEL GEORGE SCHMID, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 4th DCA | 1970-02-18
No. 2557
WALDEN and OWEN, JJ., concur., McCAIN, J., dissents, with opinion.
232 So. 2d 63 Florida District Court of Appeal, Fourth District (1970) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

McCAIN, Judge

(dissenting):

I must respectfully dissent.

The instant offense being a misdemean- or, I would transfer this appeal to the Circuit Court for Broward County, Florida. See my dissent in Brown v. State, 232 So.2d 55, Fourth District Court of Appeal, opinion filed February 12, 1970.

Dissent
McCAIN, Judge

McCAIN, Judge

(dissenting):

I must respectfully dissent.

The instant offense being a misdemean-or, I would transfer this appeal to the Circuit Court for Broward County, Florida. See my dissent in Brown v. State, 232 So. 2d 55, Fourth District Court of Appeal, opinion filed February 12, 1970.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Asset Recovery Grp., LLC v. Cabrera, 233 So. 3d 1173 (Fla. 3d DCA 2017)
    …to the Barton-doctrine. First, a receiver may be personally liable and not claim the protection of the court if he “steps outside the authority granted by the court or does things in his personal capacity and not as a receiver.” Murtha v. Steijskal, 232 So. 2d 63, 66 (Fla. 4th DCA 1970).3 Second, Cabrera contended that he was not required to seek leave from the appointing court based on the “carrying on business” exception to the Barton doctrine, which is set forth in 28 U.S.C. § 959(a) and provides as follo…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw