LEROY E. TALCOTT, JR., ET AL., PETITIONERS,
v.
CENTRAL BANK AND TRUST CO., ETC. AND BILL COLSON, RESPONDENTS
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Appellate Review cases and more on FLexlaw
The District Court of Appeal, Third District, has certified that its decision in this *659cause is one passing upon a question of great public interest. Article V, Section 4(2), Florida Constitution, F.S.A.
The factual circumstances, background, and questions involved are set forth in the decision of the District Court reported at 247 So.2d 727 (Fla.App.3rd, 1971).
We have reviewed the decision below, the record in the cause, the briefs of counsel for both sides, and have heard oral argument. It is our judgment that the decision of the District Court appropriately disposes of the issues presented. Accordingly, the opinion certified is approved as the response of this Court.
The writ of certiorari is therefore discharged.
ROBERTS, C. J., and ERVIN, ADKINS, BOYD and McCAIN, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Fla. Tomato Packers, Inc. v. Wilson, 296 So. 2d 536 (Fla. 3d DCA 1974)…us tort feasors. Hertz Corporation v. Hellens, Fla.App.1962, 140 So. 2d 73; Mathis v. Virgin, Fla.App.1964, 167 So. 2d 897, cert. den., Fla.1965, 174 So. 2d 30; Talcott v. Central Bank & Trust Co., Fla.App.1971, 247 So. 2d 727, cert. dis, Fla. 1972, 262 So. 2d 658. Motions for directed verdict, judgments in accordance with motion for directed verdict upon which ruling has been withheld, and judgments n. o. V., all share the following rules relating to their disposition by the trial court, and, on review, by…
-
SUN First Nat'l Bank OF Melbourne v. Lael N. Batchelor, 321 So. 2d 73 (Fla. 1975)…h conclusion. . National Bank of Melbourne & Trust Co. v. Batchelor, 266 So. 2d 185 (4th DCA Fla. App.), cert. denied, 269 So. 2d 369 (Fla.1972). . See Talcott v. Central Bank and Trust Co., 247 So. 2d 727 (3d DCA Fla.App.1971), decision approved, 262 So. 2d 658 (Fla.1972) ; Daniels, Torts, 14 U.Mia.L.Rev. 602, 629 (1960). Cf. Smith v. Ryder Truck Rentals, Inc., 182 So. 2d 422 (Fla.1966). . A more elaborate discussion of the policy reasons for applying this statute to all forms of torts is set forth in Jud…
-
Buster Walker v. U-Haul Co., Inc., 300 So. 2d 289 (Fla. 4th DCA 1974)…phrey and U-Haul Company of North Carolina, Inc. was intended to release only those defendants and not all joint tort feasors, and under the authority of Talcott v. Central Bank & Trust Company, Fla.App. 1971, 247 So. 2d 727 (cert, disch. Fla. 1972, 262 So. 2d 658), such satisfaction of judgment should be considered only as a pro tanto release under Section 768.041, F.S. Appellant also relies upon the case of Mathis v. Virgin, Fla.App.1964, 167 So. 2d 897 (cert. den. Fla. 1965, 174 So. 2d 30). Both of these c…
Previewing 3 of 6 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Mattox v. State, 247 So. 2d 727 (Fla. 1st DCA 1971)
- Talcott v. Cent. Bank & Tr. Co., 247 So. 2d 727 (Fla. 3d DCA 1971)