ROBERT MICHAEL TATOM, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 1st DCA | 1974-06-27
Nos. U-453, V-11
RAWLS, C. J., and McCORD and JOHNSON, JJ., concur.
296 So. 2d 578 Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (1974) Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Estes v. State, Fla.App. (1st), 294 So. 2d 122, opinion filed April 30, 1974; Kelly v. State, Fla.App. (1st), 254 So. 2d 22; North Carolina v. Alford, 400 U.S. 25, 91 S.Ct. 160, 27 L.Ed.2d 162.

RAWLS, C. J., and McCORD and JOHNSON, JJ., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Pitts v. State, 365 So. 2d 1080 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979)
    …is motion pursuant to Fla.R. Crim.P. 3.850. We affirm. The record proper clearly refutes the allegations of the motion and, therefore, the order appealed should be affirmed. See: Davis v. State, 277 So. 2d 790 (Fla. 3d DCA 1973); Williams v. State, 296 So. 2d 578 (Fla. 1st DCA 1974); Bohn v. State, 354 So. 2d 1233 (Fla. 3d DCA 1978). Affirmed.…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw