PEDRO CASTILLO, APPELLANT,
v.
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
PEDRO CASTILLO, APPELLANT,
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
330 So. 2d 217
Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1976)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 3 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. See State v. Davis, Fla.1971, 243 So. 2d 587; State v. De Jerinett, Fla.App.1973, 283 So. 2d 126; and State v. Giesy, Fla.App.1971, 243 So. 2d 635.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
In re Estate v. Bechtel, 348 So. 2d 927 (Fla. 2d DCA 1977)…eversed the judgment below and held that certain bearer bonds which were located in a jointly-owned safety deposit box on the date of the decedent’s death should be included in the inventory of the assets of the estate. Bechtel v. Estate of Bechtel, 330 So. 2d 217 (Fla.2d DCA 1976). Upon remand the successful appellant filed a petition for production of estate assets pursuant to the opinion of this court which had ruled that “. . . the bonds in question were owned by the decedent. . ” Believing himself to be…
-
Winterton v. Roma Kaufmann, 504 So. 2d 439 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987)…afe deposit box at Veit’s death. She did. A tenancy by the entirety occurs when there exist five unities: (1) unity of marriage; (2) unity of possession; (3) unity of interest; (4) unity of title; and (5) unity of time. Bechtel v. Estate of Bechtel, 330 So. 2d 217, 219 (Fla. 2d DCA 1976), aff'd [after] remand, 348 So. 2d 927 (Fla. 2d DCA 1977). All five unities are present in this case. This includes the unity of title. Bearer bonds, by their nature, are not titled in the name of one or more persons. The join…
-
United States v. ONE Single Fam. Residence With OUT Bldgs. Located AT 15621 S.W. 209th Ave., 894 F.2d 1511 (11th Cir. 1990)…e; interest-they must have an equal interest in the whole of the property; and control or possession-they both must have the right to use the entire property. Andrews v. Andrews, 155 Fla. 654, 21 So. 2d 205, 206 (1945); Bechtel v. Estate of Bechtel, 330 So. 2d 217, 219 (Fla.Dist.Ct.App.1976). Should one of these unities never have existed or be destroyed, there is no entireties estate.2 Andrews, 21 So. 2d at 206; Bechtel, 330 So. 2d at 219. As long as all the unities remain intact, however, each spouse's int…
Authorities Cited
- State v. Davis, 243 So. 2d 587 (Fla. 1971)
- State v. Giesy, 243 So. 2d 635 (Fla. 4th DCA 1971)
- State v. de Jerinett, 283 So. 2d 126 (Fla. 2d DCA 1973)