SEABOARD COAST LINE RAILROAD COMPANY, A CORPORATION, APPELLANT,
v.
MYRTICE MAE SWAIN, AS PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE OF THE ESTATE OF GERNEY LEE SWAIN, DECEASED AND MYRTICE MAE SWAIN, A WIDOW, APPELLEE
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Precedent cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM.
Appellant again assaults this court’s decision in Adams v. Seaboard Coast Line Railroad Company, 224 So. 2d 797 (Fla. 1st DCA 1969), urging that it is ill reasoned, erroneous and that we should recede therefrom. We have again considered that opinion in the light of the facts sub judice and have determined not to recede. See Shaw v. S.C.L.R. Co., 229 So. 2d 275 (Fla. 1st DCA 1970), cert. den. 237 So. 2d 540 (Fla.1970); S.C.L.R. Co. v. Ford and Britt, 238 So. 2d 473 (Fla. 1st DCA 1970); S.C.L.R. Co. v. West, 242 So. 2d 156 (Fla. 1st DCA 1971), cert. den. 246 So. 2d 112 (Fla.1971); S.C.L.R. Co. v. Dixon, 303 So. 2d 39 (Fla. 1st DCA 1974), cert. den. 315 So. 2d 181 (Fla.1975), cert. den. 423 U.S. 939, 96 S.Ct. 300, 46 L.Ed.2d 271 (1975); Schultz v. Great American Mortgage Investors, 306 So. 2d 572 (Fla. 1st DCA 1975) and Killingsworth v. Montgomery Ward & Co., 327 So. 2d 50 (Fla. 2nd DCA 1976).
The order of the learned trial judge here interlocutory appeal is
AFFIRMED.
BOYER, C. J., and RAWLS and McCORD, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Seaboard Coast Line R.R. Co. v. Myrtice Mae Swain, 362 So. 2d 17 (Fla. 1978)…HATCHETT, Justice. By Petition for Writ of Certiorari, Seaboard Coast Line Railroad Company requests this court to review a decision of the First District Court of Appeal, reported at 347 So. 2d 138 (Fla. 1st DCA 1977), on the basis of a conflict with the decision in Houston v. Caldwell, 347 So. 2d 1041 (Fla. 4th DCA 1977). We have jurisdiction pursuant to Article V, Section 3(b)(3). We affirm. Respondent brought a wrongful death action agains…
-
Fla. State Bd. OF Dentistry v. Robert J. H. Mick, D.D.S., 361 So. 2d 414 (Fla. 1978)…on of the laws. For the reasons expressed, the decision of the First District Court of Appeal is affirmed. BOYD, OVERTON, SUNDBERG, HATCHETT and ALDERMAN, JJ., concur. ADKINS, J., concurs in result only. . Mick v. Florida State Bd. of Dentistry, 347 So. 2d 138 (Fla. 1st DCA 1977). . Art. V, § 3(b)(1), Fla.Const. . In its entirety, Section 466.17(2) reads: Any dentist who does not currently maintain residence and domicile in this state, shall be issued a conditional renewal certificate upon application…
Authorities Cited (14 total)
- Yewell Adams v. Seaboard Coast Line R.R. Co., 224 So. 2d 797 (Fla. 1st DCA 1969)
- Estes v. Tasby, 423 U.S. 939 (U.S. 1975)
- Gov't Emps. Ins. Co. v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co., 246 So. 2d 112 (Fla. 1971)
- Bankers Fire & Cas. Co. v. State, 303 So. 2d 39 (Fla. 1st DCA 1974)
- Shaw v. Seaboard Coast Line R.R. Co., 229 So. 2d 275 (Fla. 1st DCA 1969)
- Seaboard Coast Line R.R. Co. v. Ford, 238 So. 2d 473 (Fla. 1st DCA 1970)
- Reliance Ins. Co. v. Dade Cnty., 237 So. 2d 540 (Fla. 1970)
- Robinson v. Waldrep Dairy, Inc., 237 So. 2d 540 (Fla. 1970)
- Killingsworth v. Montgomery Ward & Co., 327 So. 2d 50 (Fla. 2d DCA 1976)
- Seaboard Coast Line R.R. Co. v. West, 242 So. 2d 156 (Fla. 1st DCA 1970)