CARROLL OLLER, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
CARROLL OLLER, APPELLANT,
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
350 So. 2d 364
Florida District Court of Appeal, Second District (1977)
Negative Treatment
Cited by 10 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
After reviewing the briefs and record on appeal, we find the appellant has failed to demonstrate any reversible error; therefore, the judgment appealed is affirmed.
The judgment and sentence, while indicating the appellant was to receive credit for all time served in jail, does not specifically set forth the period of credit time to be allowed as required by Section 921.-161(1), Florida Statutes (1975). Smith v. State, 310 So. 2d 770 (Fla.2d DCA 1975).
Remanded for correction of sentence; otherwise affirmed. Appellant need not be present for this purpose.
BOARDMAN, C. J., and GRIMES and SCHEB, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
B. C. Builders Supply Co., Inc. v. Maldonado, 405 So. 2d 1345 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981)…tional factor in determining whether the neglect was excusable the court may consider whether the defendant subsequently demonstrated due diligence in seeking relief upon learning of the default. See, e. g., Chamberlin v. Mid-Century Insurance Co., 350 So. 2d 364 (Fla.2d DCA 1977) (subsequent delay factor in affirming trial court). We believe that this standard as first enunciated by the Supreme Court of Florida in Russ v. Gilbert, 19 Fla. 54, 57 (1882), cited by the court in Coggin v. Barfield, 150 Fla. 551…
-
Schwab & Co., Inc. v. Breezy BAY, Inc., 360 So. 2d 117 (Fla. 3d DCA 1978)…dest scope and in order to reverse a judge’s ruling thereunder, there must be a showing of a gross abuse of discretion. Randle Eastern Ambulance Service, Inc. v. Vasta, 345 So. 2d 1084 (Fla. 3d DCA 1977); Chamberlin v. Mid-Century Insurance Company, 350 So. 2d 364 (Fla. 2d DCA 1977). [*119] After reviewing the record in the case at bar, we cannot say that the trial judge abused his discretion, grossly or otherwise in determining that Schwab’s misplaced reliance upon its insurer for its timely defense is not e…
-
Garcia Ins. Agency, Inc. v. Diaz, 351 So. 2d 1137 (Fla. 2d DCA 1977)…sistency disappears. The latter proposition has been with us for quite some time, see, e. g., Coggin v. Barfield, 150 Fla. 551, 8 So. 2d 9 (1942), and has been reiterated recently both by this court, Chamberlin v. Mid-Century Insurance Co., et al., 350 So. 2d 364 (Opinion filed October 5, 1977), and the supreme court, Sterling Drug, Inc. v. Wright, 342 So. 2d 503 (Fla.1977). See also this court’s recent opinion in Bailey v. Deebold, 351 So. 2d 355 (Opinion filed October, 21, 1977). With reference to the for…
Previewing 3 of 10 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Smith v. State, 310 So. 2d 770 (Fla. 2d DCA 1975)
- Odom v. State, 310 So. 2d 770 (Fla. 2d DCA 1975)