NORMAN EDWARD DEAN, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
NORMAN EDWARD DEAN, APPELLANT,
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
364 So. 2d 524
Florida District Court of Appeal, Second District (1978)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 20 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
After reviewing the briefs and record on appeal, we find appellant has failed to demonstrate any reversible error; therefore, the judgment appealed is affirmed. The judgment and sentence of the court, while indicating the appellant was to receive credit for all time served in jail, does not specifically set forth the period of credit time to be allowed as required by Section 921.161(1), Florida Statutes. Smith v. State, 310 So. 2d 770 (Fla.2d DCA 1975).
Remanded for correction of the sentence; otherwise affirmed. Appellant need not be present for this purpose.
GRIMES, C. J., and SCHEB and OTT, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By (20 total)
-
Mercer v. J.D. Raine, Sr., 443 So. 2d 944 (Fla. 1983)…d 529 (Fla. 2d DCA 1970). We agree that the striking of pleadings or entering a default for noncompliance with an order compelling discovery is the most severe of all sanctions which should be employed only in extreme circumstances. Hart v. Weaver, 364 So. 2d 524 (Fla. 2d DCA 1978). A deliberate and contumacious disregard of the court’s authority will justify application of this severest of sanctions, Swindle v. Reid, 242 So. 2d 751 (Fla. 4th DCA 1970), as will bad faith, willful disregard or gross indiffere…
-
Ilene Sales Kornblum v. Schneider, 609 So. 2d 138 (Fla. 4th DCA 1992)…ny before the court. . Tri Star Investments, Inc. v. Miele, 407 So. 2d 292 (Fla. 2d DCA 1981). . Ferrante v. Waters, 383 So. 2d 749 (Fla. 4th DCA 1980). . Johnson v. Landmark First Natl Bank, 415 So. 2d 161 (Fla. 4th DCA 1982). . Hart v. Weaver, 364 So. 2d 524 (Fla. 2d DCA 1978). . See, e.g., Johnson v. Landmark First Nat'l Bank, supra; Ferrante v. Waters, supra. . See, e.g., Kirby v. Adkins, 582 So. 2d 1209 (Fla. 5th DCA 1991); Parham v. Kohler, 134 So. 2d 274 (Fla. 3d DCA 1961). . Appellant’s counsel…
-
Watson v. Peskoe, 407 So. 2d 954 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981)…stantiate such a finding. We agree that the striking of pleadings or entering a default for noncompliance with an order compelling discovery is the most severe of all sanctions which should be employed only in extreme circumstances. Hart v. Weaver, 364 So. 2d 524 (Fla.2d DCA 1978). A deliberate and contumacious disregard of the court’s authority will justify application of this severest of sanctions, Swindle v. Reid, 242 So. 2d 751 (Fla. 4th DCA 1970), as will bad faith, willful disregard or gross indifferen…
Previewing 3 of 20 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Smith v. State, 310 So. 2d 770 (Fla. 2d DCA 1975)
- Odom v. State, 310 So. 2d 770 (Fla. 2d DCA 1975)