AUDREY V. MCLEAN, APPELLANT-CROSS APPELLEE,
v.
RALPH E. MCLEAN, JR., APPELLEE-CROSS APPELLANT
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Special Equity cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM.
No abuse of discretion has been demonstrated by either party in the trial court’s determinations (a) awarding two years of rehabilitative, rather than permanent alimony;1 (b) as to the amount of that alimony; (c) denying the wife’s claim to a “special equity” in the husband’s interest in the marital home; (d) fixing the amount of the wife’s attorney’s fees and ordering that the husband pay one-half of that sum and (e) allocating responsibility between the parties for the expenses of a child psychologist. Canakaris v. Canakaris, 382 So. 2d 1197 (Fla.1980); Ingram v. Ingram, 379 So. 2d 955 (Fla.1980); Rosenberg v. Rosenberg, 371 So. 2d 672 (Fla.1979), adopting dissenting opinion, 352 So. 3d 867 (Fla.3d DCA 1977); Herzog v. Herzog, 346 So. 2d 56 (Fla. 1977); Ball v. Ball, 335 So. 2d 5 (Fla.1976); Shaw v. Shaw, 334 So. 2d 13 (Fla.1976); Creel v. Creel, 378 So. 2d 1251 (Fla.3d DCA 1979). The final judgment and the post-final judgment orders under review are therefore
Affirmed.
. We specifically note that this provision is subject to modification upon a timely and proper showing under Section 61.14, Florida Statutes (1979). Cantor v. Cantor, 306 So. 2d 596 (Fla.2d DCA 1975).
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Nury Agudo v. Marcelo M. Agudo, 449 So. 2d 909 (Fla. 3d DCA 1984)…hen the mother is gainfully employed, we find no error in the trial court’s ruling limiting the time for rehabilitative alimony. No complaint is made as to the reasonableness of the award. Kuvin v. Kuvin, 442 So. 2d 203 (Fla.1983); McLean v. McLean, 384 So. 2d 915 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980). We cannot say on this record that the automatic increase in child support from $150 a week to $200 a week at the time of the expiration of the wife’s rehabilitative alimony, to wit: 12 months, is erroneous. The husband claims su…
-
Urban v. Urban, 424 So. 2d 22 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982)…e was not fluent in English. An interpreter was required during the hearings in the trial court. She needs to learn the English language and to acquire a skill to enable her to enter the job market at approximately 50 years of age. McLean v. McLean, 384 So. 2d 915 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980); Canakaris v. Canakaris, supra; Moses v. Moses, 344 So. 2d 1322 (Fla. 2d DCA 1977); Goldberg v. Goldberg, 327 So. 2d 828 (Fla. 3d DCA 1976). The award of attorney’s fee was within the range of the evidence and there has been no e…
-
State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. Ware, 391 So. 2d 331 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980)…in that no final judgment on the merits has been rendered by the trial court in the plaintiff’s favor which is necessary to activate Section 627.-428(1), Florida Statutes (1979). Insurance Company of North America v. Electric Power & Service, Inc., 384 So. 2d 915 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980); American Home Assurance Company v. Keller Industries, Inc., 347 So. 2d 767 (Fla. 3d DCA 1977), cert. denied, 360 So. 2d 1249 (Fla.1978), cert. dismissed, 367 So. 2d 1124 (Fla.1979). Reversed and remanded.…
Previewing 3 of 4 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Canakaris v. Canakaris, 382 So. 2d 1197 (Fla. 1980)
- Shaw v. Shaw, 334 So. 2d 13 (Fla. 1976)
- Shannon v. State, 335 So. 2d 5 (Fla. 1976)
- Herzog v. Herzog, 346 So. 2d 56 (Fla. 1977)
- Ingram v. Ingram, 379 So. 2d 955 (Fla. 1980)
- Rosenberg v. Rosenberg, 371 So. 2d 672 (Fla. 1979)
- Creel v. Creel, 378 So. 2d 1251 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979)
- Cantor v. Cantor, 306 So. 2d 596 (Fla. 2d DCA 1975)