JOHN WILLIE WISHOP, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
John Wishop appeals the denial of his motion for arrest of judgment, arguing that his conviction for possession of a firearm during the commission of a felony cannot stand because he was convicted of attempted second degree murder rather than the charged attempted first degree murder. The court affirms, holding that the firearm possession conviction is valid because an underlying felony exists, even though it is a lesser degree than charged.
The court held that the firearm possession conviction is valid because there is an underlying felony (attempted second degree murder) to support it. The fact that the defendant was convicted of a lesser degree of felony than charged does not invalidate the weapons charge.
[1] A conviction for possession of a firearm during the commission of a felony must stand or fall in conjunction with the underlying felony.
[2] A conviction for possession of a firearm during the commission of a felony can stand when the defendant is convicted of a lesser degree of the underlying felony, as oppos…
Previewing 2 of 4 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence“a conviction for unlawful possession of a firearm during the commission of a felony 'must stand or fall in conjunction with the underlying felony.'”
States the Redondo principle that the firearm charge depends on an underlying felony existing
Previewing 1 of 3 key quotes on this case — the court’s exact language, pinpointed for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceWishop was initially charged with attempted first degree murder and possession of a firearm in the commission of a felony. The jury convicted him of t…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Attempted Felony cases and more on FLexlaw
UPCHURCH, Chief Judge.
John Wishop appeals from an order denying a motion for arrest of judgment. Wish-op was initially charged with attempted first degree murder and the possession of a firearm in the commission of a felony. He was convicted of attempted second degree murder and possession of a firearm in the commission of a felony. Wishop contends that because the state elected to charge him with possession of a firearm while attempting to commit first degree murder, he cannot be convicted of the firearm possession charge after he was acquitted on the underlying felony (attempted first degree murder) and found guilty of the lesser felony. In support of his motion for arrest of judgment, Wishop cited Redondo v. State, 403 So. 2d 954 (Fla.1981), where the court held that a conviction for unlawful possession of a firearm during the commission of a felony “must stand or fall in conjunction with the underlying felony.” In Redondo, the defendant was charged with aggravated battery and the jury found the defendant guilty of the lesser offense of simple battery, a misdemeanor, in addition to possession of a firearm during the commission of a felony. Id. at 955.
The Florida Supreme Court held that the weapon possession charge could not stand because there was no underlying felony. Id. at 956.
The trial court distinguished Redondo, where no felony was proven, from the instant case, stating “the jury did find defendant guilty of attempted murder but in the second degree rather than the first degree.” The statutory provision dealing with possession of a firearm during the commission of a felony provides:
Whoever, while committing or attempting to commit any felony or while under indictment, displays, uses, threatens, or attempts to use any firearm or carries a concealed firearm is guilty of a felony of the second degree, punishable as provided in s. 775.082, s. 775.083, and s. 775.-084. (emphasis supplied)
§ 790.07(2), Fla.Stat. (1985).
The Redondo decision has been repeatedly followed where the defendant was convicted of possession of a firearm during a felony when there was no remaining underlying felony. Davidson v. State, 458 So. 2d 880 (Fla. 5th DCA 1984); Herring v. State, 435 So. 2d 865 (Fla. 3d DCA), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 1018, 104 S.Ct. 549, 79 L.Ed.2d 723 (1983); Agrado v. State, 431 So. 2d 320 (Fla.3d DCA 1983). See also Pitts v. State, 425 So. 2d 542 (Fla.1983); Mahaun v. State, 377 So. 2d 1158 (Fla. 1979).
Under Florida law once an information or indictment charges a particular degree of a crime the jurors may find the defendant guilty of the degree charged or of any lesser degree. See Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.490 and Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.510(b). In the instant case, there was an underlying felony to support the weapons charge and the fact that the state charged a greater felony offense than that for which Wishop was convicted has no effect. The decision below is
AFFIRMED.
DAUKSCH and ORFINGER, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- Redondo v. State, 403 So. 2d 954 (Fla. 1981)
- Mahaun v. State, 377 So. 2d 1158 (Fla. 1979)
- Wodford v. State (Fla. 1st DCA 2024)
- Pitts v. State, 425 So. 2d 542 (Fla. 1983)
- Keasler v. Granat, 464 U.S. 1018 (U.S. 1983)
- Cicconi v. United States, 464 U.S. 1018 (U.S. 1983)
- Ayrado v. State, 431 So. 2d 320 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983)
- Herring v. State, 435 So. 2d 865 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983)
- Davidson v. State, 458 So. 2d 880 (Fla. 5th DCA 1984)