ORLANDO NICHOLAS LOPEZ, APPELLANT,
v.
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 3d DCA | 1990-09-11
No. 89-1349
Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and JORGENSON and GODERICH, JJ.
566 So. 2d 370 Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1990) Positive Treatment
Cited by 4 cases

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. McCray v. State, 416 So. 2d 804 (Fla.1982); Andrade v. State, 564 So. 2d 238 (Fla. 3d DCA 1990); Taylor v. State, 472 So. 2d 814 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985); M.C. v. State, 450 So. 2d 336 (Fla. 5th DCA 1984); McCain v. State, 390 So. 2d 779 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980), rev. denied, 399 So. 2d 1144 (Fla.1981).


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • 944 Cwelt-2007 LLC v. Bank OF Am., N.A., 194 So. 3d 470 (Fla. 3d DCA 2016)
    …' It is well settled that a foreclosure sale cannot be held while a timely motion for rehearing is pending because enforcement of a final judgment is suspended by the filing of the rehearing motion. United Invs. Ltd. P’ship v. Resolution Tr. Corp., 566 So. 2d 370, 370 (Fla. 3d DCA 1990) (Mem). Accordingly, the trial court erred by not cancelling the August 10, 2015 foreclosure sale, and the foreclosure sale must be set aside. See Hoffman v. BankUnited, N.A., 137 So. 3d 1039 (Fla. 2d DCA 2014) (Mem). Based o…
  • Diaz v. U.S. Bank, 239 So. 3d 151 (Fla. 3d DCA 2018)

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw