SHAWN RUBEK, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 4th DCA | 1994-08-03
No. 93-2502
STONE, POLEN and PARIENTE, JJ., concur.
640 So. 2d 1199 Florida District Court of Appeal, Fourth District (1994)

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.


Holding

The court held that the trial court erred in imposing an adult sentence on a juvenile without strictly following statutory requirements and reducing the decision to writing.


Facts & Procedural History

Appellant, a juvenile, received an adult sentence. The trial court's decision was not reduced to writing and contained conclusory findings.…

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

Appellant’s sentence as an adult is reversed and remanded for resentencing. In Troutman v. State, 630 So. 2d 528 (Fla.1993), the court made it clear that sections 39.-059(7)(e) and (d), Florida Statutes, must be followed before imposing an adult sentence on a juvenile. Here, the court’s decision was not reduced to writing as required. Additionally, although the trial court did make an effort to individualize its reasoning, many of the findings were, as in Troutman, essentially eonclusory and couched in the language of the statute.

On resentencing, if the court again determines that an adult sentence should be imposed, the statutory criteria should be more strictly applied. See Troutman. See also Bradley v. State, 559 So. 2d 283 (Fla. 4th DCA 1990); West v. State, 503 So. 2d 435 (Fla. 4th DCA 1987).

In all other respects the judgment is affirmed. If he wishes, Appellant may pursue the request made to this court to withdraw his plea by addressing that issue to the trial court by proper motion. See e.g., Peak v. State, 399 So. 2d 1043 (Fla. 5th DCA 1981). We reject the contention that on remand the sentencing must be assigned to a different judge.

STONE, POLEN and PARIENTE, JJ., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw